The hazards of cycling

Cycling is, unfortunately, rather neglected in this column, which circulates in a substantially rural area where it is actually a rather hazardous form of transport.

Tuesday, 26th February 2019, 13:42 pm
Updated Thursday, 14th February 2019, 15:06 pm
Paddington Station.

While it might seem idyllic to cycle in little-used country lanes, cyclists may find that there are, in fact, two principal dangers.

Firstly, the ever-increasing size and speed of cars, lorries and farm machinery results in the breaking up of the edge of the road surface, as well as worsening potholes in the main part of the carriageway.

This can be a serious danger to a cyclist, especially when meeting another vehicle.

The result of falling off in such circumstances can be not only personal injury to the cyclist from the fall, but something of a much worse injury if the fall happens to be into the path of the oncoming vehicle.

Sign up to our daily newsletter

The i newsletter cut through the noise

Secondly, there is simply the lack of understanding of the needs of cyclists on the part of many drivers today.

In the past, there was a natural progression for young people from pedestrian to cyclist, to motorcyclist, to car driver.

Consequently, when these people began to drive cars they were acutely aware of what they needed to do to keep cyclists safe on the roads.

Unfortunately, young people nowadays often start out with a small car and never see the road from any other perspective, except that of a pedestrian.

The omission of the experience as a cyclist is regrettable.

In the cities, many commuters have taken to keeping a bike at their arrival station and using it to cycle from the station to their place of work each morning, returning at the end of their working day.

This is particularly noticeable in London, which is the largest city, and is aggravated by the cost of using the underground system and buses.

When the writer of this column started work, a short journey on the underground was two (old) pence, less than one new penny.

When people talk of overcrowding on the underground now, they do not know what it was like then.

Despite congestion charging, the traffic in London is still such that cyclists can weave to and fro between other vehicles, often creating friction between themselves and drivers.

It seems that gone are the days when road users actually treated each other with courtesy and consideration.

A similar lack of courtesy and consideration is demonstrated by some young cyclists who apparently do not understand the rules governing when they may ride on the pavement.

Many of them seem to think that they can do so wherever and whenever they please, but this is not so.

Cyclists may ride on the pavement only where there are notices displayed indicating that it is shared use, and there is a general rule that pedestrians have priority at all times.

Try telling that to some of the young riders.

Some cyclists are fully aware of the rules of the road and have excellent lights.

However, a lady motorist in a rural area recently described her shock at being about to pull out of a side road in the dark when a cyclist, wearing dark clothing and without any lights, appeared in the gloaming at the crucial moment.

If she had collided with him, whose fault would it have been?

Apparently the police, who previously were able to enforce even minor aspects of the law, and generally encouraged good manners on the road, are now so deprived of resources that they generally have to leave it to the insurance companies to concentrate motorists’ minds on their driving standards.

Unfortunately, this method does not apply to cyclists, who still have no need of licences or insurance.

And some of them seem to think there are no rules which apply to them.