Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Friday, 3rd September 2010

Government dismisses two out of three wind fam proposals

Green light for Barmoor; Moorsyde and Toft Hill schemes rejected

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date:
21 January 2010
A WINDFARM at Barmoor is the only one of three to be given planning approval following a public inquiry.
Other windfarms, at Moorsyde, near Felkington, and Toft Hill, near Duddo, have both been rejected by the Government's planning inspector, Ruth MacKenzie and the secretary of state, John Denham MP.

The six-turbine windfarm at Barmoor has been appro
ved after Mrs MacKenzie and John Denham found that "despite major landscape effects at close quarters, the containment of the site by hills and woodland would prevent the significant effects of the proposal spreading more than about 1km from the site."

Mr Denham also agreed with the inspector in that although the setting of Ford Moss Colliery, a scheduled ancient monument, would be changed by the windfarm, it was not to an 'unacceptable degree.'

The seven turbine scheme at Moorsyde was rejected on the grounds of the effect of the proposed scheme on the Cheviots and the noise from the turbines.

TheToft Hill proposal, for seven turbines was rejected on the basis on the adverse effects it would have on the Duddo stone circle.

What do you think of the wind farm decisions? Post a comment on this story.

For full coverage and reaction, see the Advertiser on Thursday, January 28.




Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 January 2010 10:53 AM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Berwick
 
Prev
1
Next
1

bezmond,

Newcastle 21/01/2010 14:44:43
Great news about Barmoor, shame about the others.
2

Divers_uk,

Moorsyde resident 21/01/2010 14:53:38
RESULT! Lets hope this puts a stop to the barrage of applicants that have lined up further greedy farmers that would have jumped on the bandwagon had all three gone through. Perhaps the residents can now be left to retain their Cheviot views and natural silence without further upset.
Andy
3

Divers_uk,

Allerdean 21/01/2010 14:57:22
Can we now look forward to EON withdrawing their proposed ill advised scheme on the basis it has the same constraints as Moorsyde - Cheviot views and noise issues?
4

bezmond,

Newcastle 21/01/2010 16:06:35
This is great news for Barmoor. Not so good for the others. Let's hope some more do get approved in the North East though
5

Black grouse,

Borders 21/01/2010 17:08:20
Congratulations to the hundreds of local people whose support made this victory possible.

However, it should not be forgotten that we are all still under siege from speculative wind developers.

As Divers_uk notes the West Allerdean proposal, which is contiguous with the Moorsyde site, is still in the planning system. There are also plans by RES for turbines near Halidon Hill and at Murton.

Meanwhile, just over the border, the jackals of the wind industry are fighting over the corpse of the Lammermuirs - still designated as an 'Area of Great Landscape Value' (AGL), but now described by even the wind developers as, "a well established wind farm landscape".

Please support the Save The Lammermuirs campaign in their efforts to save what is left of the area. See:
http://www.savethelammermuirs.com/the-lammermuir-hills.html
6

bezmond,

newcastle 22/01/2010 09:32:03
great news about the Barmoor one. A bit of a shame about the others though.
Lets hope all the campaigners give any funds they have remaining to good causes.
7

Black grouse,

Borders 22/01/2010 17:37:50
Correction: of course I meant the West Ancroft proposal, not 'West Allerdean'.

Further details are available on the West Ancroft Community Action (WACA)website at - http://www.waca.uk.net/
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.